Ruben Bemelmans vs David Guez Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L L L L
Form
L W L L L L L W W LHead-To-Head: Bemelmans 2 - 1 Guez
They have played 7 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 5 and Guez winning 2. The last match between Bemelmans and Guez was at the Glasgow Challenger, 07-02-2015, Semifinals, I.hard with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ruben Bemelmans | 2 |
| David Guez | 1 |
Glasgow Challenger(07-02-2015)
6
3
7
5
| Bemelmans | Stats | Guez |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 84 | Highest Rank | 116 |
| 37 | Age | 42 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 20 | Titles | 31 |
| 57% (552-419) | Career Total W/L | 61% (641-414) |
| $1,013,488 | Career Prize Money | $215,535 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
David Guez
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
David Guez
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 27 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:54:1 | Average Match Time | 0:54:1 |
| 64% (137/214) | 1st Serve % | 48% (101/209) |
| 68% (93/137) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (59/101) |
| 39% (30/77) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (52/108) |
| 56% (15/27) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (9/23) |
| 47% (98/209) | Return Points Win % | 43% (91/214) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
David Guez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
David Guez
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Erik Crepaldi
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Edgar Jeanmougin
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
David Guez
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
37%
(
28 of
75)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
David Guez
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
David Guez
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Guez
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
7
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
David Guez
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
David Guez
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (552/419) | Win/Loss | 61% (641/414) |
| 55% (1294/1046) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1409/1012) |
| 52% (12026/11063) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (11855/10374) |
| 54% (154/131) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (184/93) |
| 48% (79/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (198/153) |
| 63% (259/155) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (257/162) |
| 55% (60/49) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 4063 | Aces Total | 832 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1912 | Total Double Faults | 1021 |
| 1:5:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 580.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 611.53 |
| 63% (32697/51842) | 1st Serve % | 59% (19179/32680) |
| 73% (23728/32697) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (12450/19179) |
| 52% (9987/19146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6688/13503) |
| 40% (1787/4501) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1659/3629) |
| 37% (19613/52826) | Return Points Win % | 43% (13710/32035) |
| 56% (65/51) | Slam W/L | 45% (25/31) |
| 36% (9/16) | Masters W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 35% (8/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (77/77) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (31/31) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (263/218) | Challenger W/L | 49% (225/235) |
| 76% (130/42) | Futures W/L | 77% (356/108) |
| 57% (526/916) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (630/1039) |
| 43% (19/44) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 50% (208/420) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (118/241) |
| 50% (173/347) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (176/307) |
| 84% (542/456) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (614/546) |
| 15% (542/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (614/68) |
| 21% (428/92) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (441/95) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
